Last updated: 10th March 2009
| Player Name | Points |
| Ollie Maddox | 2 |
| Adam Cope | 11 |
| Simon Meredith | 3 |
| Chris Punter | 0 |
| Mark Humphreys | 2.5 |
| Max Fountain | 0 |
| Oliver King | 2 |
| Henry Entwhistle | 6.5 |
| Nas Andriopoulos | 7 |
| Bishan Morgan | 4.5 |
| Ed Aspinal | 6.5 |
| Tim Goodman | 1 |
| Ben Maddox | 3 |
| Will Neaverson | 0 |
| Alex Wicks | 1 |
| Angus Imlach | 1 |
| James Plumstead | 0 |
| James Barton | 1 |
| Matthew Smith | 0 |
| Ed Usher | 0 |
| Chris Isaacs | 0 |
I do believe that it looks like Adam is the best player. However it is unfair as he has only played (I apologise to the younger contingent) the ‘easier’ players.
I suggest using the Glicko rating system to calculate who has the best rating. The formula shown on the link below will enable you to gather an accurate and a fair representation of every player. I trust you to do it ALL by hand and not enter values into a machine. Miss Costanza will be pleased with you.
http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/glicko/glicko.doc/glicko.html
Regards,
Missingno.
Are you saying Adam isn’t the best player???
Your point is very valid, and the complexity of rating systems means that I’m only going to publish scores and points from games now on. I’m thinking of removing the clock requirement so we can get more game data though… any thoughts?
Good idea.
please add my result against tim